Click on the image above to hear the full story. This is a 30-minute video but you will need that long to understand this “Alice in Wonderland situation”.
We are going through a challenging period when well-established concepts are being dismissed without any scientific justification. The answer to the question “When is a vaccine not a vaccine?” comes from the accepted definition of a vaccine:
“A vaccine protects the patient from infection by a disease and eliminates or reduces the risk of the patient infecting others.” A vaccine is not a vaccine when it is an experimental genetic medicine that neither gives protection against a virus nor reduces or stops further transmission of the disease, this is broadly what two current so-called vaccines are. Moderna and Pfizer mRNA shots are labeled as “vaccines,” and news agencies and health policy leaders call them that, the actual patents for Pfizer’s and Moderna’s injections more truthfully describe them as “gene therapy,” not vaccines.
- By referring to COVID-19 vaccines as “vaccines” rather than gene therapies, the U.S. government is violating its 15 U.S. Code Section 41, which regulates deceptive practices in medical claims
- The mRNA injections are gene therapies that do not fulfill a single criterion or definition of a vaccine
- COVID-19 “vaccines” do not impart immunity or inhibit the transmissibility of the disease. They only are designed to lessen your infection symptoms if or when you get infected. As such, these products do not meet the legal or medical definition of a vaccine
- Since a vast majority of people who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 have no symptoms at all, they’ve not even been able to establish a causal link between the virus and the clinical disease
- By calling this experimental gene therapy technology a “vaccine,” they are circumventing liability for damages that would otherwise apply