Infant mortality down; number of vaccinations down!

“But the pandemic experience has brought on a surprising effect on this expected death rate among children. Starting in early March, expected deaths began a sharp decline, from an expected level of around 700 deaths per week to well under 500 by mid-April and throughout May.”

“As untimely deaths spiked among the elderly in Manhattan nursing homes and in similar settings all over the country, something mysterious was saving the lives of children. As springtime in America came along with massive disruptions in family life amid near universal lockdowns, roughly 30% fewer children died.”

“Virtually the entire change came from infants. Somehow, the changing pattern of American life during the lockdowns has been saving the lives of hundreds of infants, over 200 per week.”

“One very clear change that has received publicity is that public health officials are bemoaning the sharp decline in infant vaccinations as parents are not taking their infants into pediatric offices for their regular well-baby checks. In the May 15 issue of the CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), a group of authors from the CDC and Kaiser Permanente reported a sharp decline in provider orders for vaccines as well as a decline in pediatric vaccine doses administered. These declines began in early March, around the time infant deaths began declining.”

Mustn’t report that on the nightly news.  A leak of truth might turn into a river.

The very thought that vaccines are harmful enough to cause death, and withholding them would align with the Hippocratic Oath?

“Say Bob, here’s an interesting item we could run on the broadcast tonight.  Deaths of infants are down during the pandemic, and so are vaccinations.”

“I see.  So you want to end up announcing Frisbee contests during picnics in the park?  And I’ll be producing free YouTube videos featuring cats doing somersaults?  You’re drinking again, right?”

For those who can’t bring themselves to even stick a toe in the waters of the evidence against vaccines, because their cult of science forbids it on pain of death…and who, likewise, salute all public health directives concerning the “pandemic,” like good little boys and girls, here is a backgrounder I call…

                                                       (For more information on childhood vaccination  check this short video by Dr. Jayne Donnegan HERE )

To the “educated” potato heads: science is not a political hierarchy

Remember the science bloggers living in mommy’s basement?  Now we have the new COVID version.

“Who’s a Communist?”  “I’m a Communist.”  “Who’s a Communist?”  “I’m a Communist.”  It’s fun.  It’s a new toy to play with.  Capitalism is out.  Old-fashioned.

“Mao killed 60 million of his own people.”  “Who’s Mao?”

So far, I’ve written about 150 articles on the preposterous COVID fakery.  In this piece, I’m going to discuss political hierarchy.

Which is how Tony Fauci got to where he is.  It has nothing to do with knowledge or skill in handling purported “outbreaks.”  And if it weren’t Fauci, it would be someone else.  Another person on television standing next to the president.  Because that is the structure, the pecking order.  There are slots to fill.  And there must be a central mouthpiece.

“Wanted.  Spokesperson to represent The Word.”

Whose word?

Do you really believe that, at the beginning of this whole COVID operation…Fauci is sinking himself deep in collaborative meetings with scientists to come up with a plan?  There is back and forth?  Opinions are challenged?  Data are examined?  Objections are made?  Fauci listens to a representative from Sweden, where the government is taking a different path?  He listens to a pro like Dr. Scott Atlas?  Economic advisors are in the room, making calculations on the devastating effects of a three-month national lockdown?  Fact-checkers, not bullshitters, look into the past track record of that abject failure, Neil Ferguson, who is predicting on his worn-out computer that two million people in America will die—which is the whole rationale for ordering lockdowns?  Someone who is actually intelligent and honest, who works for a US intelligence agency, steps in and questions the event that kicked off all the false hysteria—the Chinese Regime, an overt enemy of the US, locking down 50 million people overnight for no medical reason and sending a fake signal to the WHO and CDC that this is the new model for control?  Do you think any of this happens in a room?

Do you think your college education and what you think you know has the slightest connection to this situation because you took a biology course and a chemistry course and can find your way around a computer?

Do you have any idea how much counter-information which contradicts your gnome-hero, Fauci, has been piling up in the past three months, and how much of it has been coming from people with all sorts of credentials you would otherwise admire?  Do you?  Do you know how much of this information has been suppressed by the press?  No, you don’t.  You’re a potato head.

The discovery of a new virus has been challenged.  The PCR and antibody tests have been discredited as a legitimate avenue of diagnosis; along with widespread eyeball diagnosis, and coding patients as COVID who really have other unrelated conditions, and counting non-COVID deaths as COVID, this means all the case numbers are meaningless.  The overwhelming number of people dying of the “pandemic” are the elderly, who have years of serious health problems, who have been treated with many toxic drugs, who are then terrified by receiving a false COVID diagnosis, who are isolated from family and friends and die.  Many old people in these straits are put on ventilators, heavily sedated, and die from the treatment.

But none of this information that challenges the official picture is shoved in the face of public health officials, with a government demand that they respond openly, and in detail.  Why?  Because the political hierarchy is geared to close out dissent.  This has nothing to do with science.

Science involves questions and rebuttals and counter-opinion, and studies that test other options and views.  Science is about confirming or denying official positions through analysis and experiment.  It isn’t about who has wormed his way to the top of the food chain.  It isn’t about who is secretly backing the Mouthpiece.  Aka Bill Gates.

Some potato heads look at things this way: whatever Trump is saying is a lie.  The person who opposes Trump must be right.  That person appears to be Fauci.  Therefore, Fauci is stating SCIENCE.  End of story.

Very few, if any potato heads are aware of the following statement, from a woman who has scrutinized more medical studies than at least 99.9 percent of the doctors on the planet:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” -Marcia Angell, MD (“Drug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption.” NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)

Very few, if any potato heads are aware of the review published in the Journal of the American Medical Association on July 26, 2000, by the revered public health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Dr. Barbara Starfield.  Starfield concluded that every year in the US, the medical system kills 225,000 people.  (Review: “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?” (This is as revealed in Dr. Colin T Campbell’s Book “How Not to Die”)

Those are two examples of what we could call counter-science.  They take the mainstream to task.  They deliver blows to official positions.  THIS is what “Fauci-science” should have been subjected to, from the get-go.  And this is what “vaccine science”—the holy of holies—should be subjected to.